'Daylight Origins Society' reading material


Home page

About us

Reading material

Book store

Subscribe to our magazine


Page 3

"Is Evolution an Open Question for Catholics?"
Kolbe Center for the Study of Creation

Influence Of Evolution Beliefs Upon Birth Control Dissenters

It seems highly likely that the pro-evolutionary convictions of dissenters was a key factor in their determination to promote the contraceptive mindset. As Dr. Haussler also pointed out, the secular proponents of abortion,

… skillfully exploited the disunity of the German Catholic intellectuals to bring their demands for the legalization of abortion to the legislature. … Karl Rahner, who was in the forefront of the fight over [the loosening of] paragraph 218 [of the Constitution], wrote in Naturwissen-schaft und Theologie (brochure 11, page 86, 1970): “I think that there are biological developments which are pre-human, but these developments are still aimed in the direction of man. Why cannot these developments be transferred from phylogeny to ontogeny?” It is undeniable that prominent Catholic professors of theology, including two well-known Jesuit priests, Rahner and Nell-Breuning, were prominent in the debate about paragraph 218. They supported and published opinions that were not only scientifically wrong but also diametrically opposed to the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church.
Dr Haussler also had this to say, back in October 1982:

The hypothesis that man is gradually endowed with a living soul appears to me to be a disastrous mistake in logic. It is therefore incomprehensible for the leading and most influential theologian of the German-speaking world, Professor Karl Rahner SJ to endorse this viewpoint. (Rahner supported it in his essay “The Problem of Hominization” published in Quaestiones Disputata 12/13, 1965, and again in Naturwissenschaft and Theologie 11, 1970.) German theologians who defend the Pill refer to Rahner’s incorrect theses; they believe that the human soul is not endowned at fertilization but at a later time-in any case, not before implantation. Fortunately, Romano Guardini saved the honor and reputation of German theology as early as 1947, six years before the discovery of the genetic code, writing in the Frankfurter Hefte (Frankfurt booklets): “It was said that in the early time period of the embryo, approximately up to day 100, the embryo did not yet have a soul of its own, but was a being which belongs completely to the maternal organism. … [But] the cycle of his human transition begins with the uniting of parental cells, culminates in the morphologic completion, and continues until death. Therefore he is a human being from the moment of conception.” It is admirable that Romano Guardini could write these sentences before the work was done on the genetic code. That so many German theologians continue to believe in Rahner’s hypotheses, even after the discovery of the genetic code, is impossible to understand.
Page 1 - Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4 - Page 5 - Page 6 - Page 7 - Page 8 - Page 9 - Page 10 - Page 11 - Page 12 - Page 13 - Page 14